Why Modern Facility Compliance Demands a New Standard in Electrical Safety Testing

Electrical hazards cause casualties, and construction companies face penalties from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) and the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA). By investing in comprehensive safety training, testing and engineering, leaders can safeguard their organization.

OSHA Introduces a New Electrical Safety Initiative

In March 2026, OSHA introduced the Roll Up Initiative. It aims to promote basic safety awareness by highlighting the need for construction sites to inspect cords, cables and corded tools. It also provides basic inspection and maintenance guidelines, empowering contractors to address issues proactively.

This initiative comes as OSHA changes its expectations for documentation and hazard control. While core regulations remain largely unchanged, enforcement priorities are shifting. By modernizing, construction companies can avoid costly penalties, improve site safety and increase bidding competitiveness.

OSHA is ramping up inspections for the hazards associated with serious injuries and fatalities. From 2011 to 2024, the latest years for which data is available, there were 1,654 workplace fatalities attributed to electrical issues, 70% of which came from non-electrical occupations. This is why testing and training are so crucial.

Electrical Testing Equipment and Service Providers

These are some of the best companies providing electrical testing equipment and services.

1.    Power Solutions Group

As a long-standing International Electrical Testing Association (NETA) member and accredited company, Power Solutions Group provides independent testing. It also custom-engineers electrical safety and testing equipment tailored to specific sites and voltage classes.

The team creates construction-ready engineering drawings, documents and schematics, then manufactures custom solutions in the in-house lab. It also manages the entire purchasing process, from vendor selection to logistics. If issues arise, it provides troubleshooting.

Key features:

• NETA-accredited field technicians provide testing, commissioning and maintenance.
• Some of the training team work with standards-setting bodies.
• The company offers analysis, troubleshooting and 24/7 disaster recovery services.

2. Allison-Smith Company

Electrical contracting and engineering company Allison-Smith Company provides engineering, prefabrication, manufacturing and design-build services. It can design and manufacture custom components that are Underwriters Laboratories and Electrical Testing Laboratories listed.

Key features:

• With 30 full-time safety personnel, it has one of the sector’s lowest experience modification rates.
• As a fully certified testing group, it offers a broad range of testing services.
• All team members are trained in OSHA 10 and 30 to minimize potential hazards.

3. JM Test Systems

The custom testing equipment from JM Test Systems is American-made. The team designs and manufactures solutions tailored to unique project requirements. The company also supplies prebuilt electrical safety and testing equipment, including arc flash suits and thermal cameras.

In addition to supplying equipment, it provides calibration, testing and repair services aligned with industry standards. As an accredited testing laboratory, it delivers unbiased results. On-site testing is available. Either way, the technicians create detailed reports at no additional charge.

Key features:

• Expedited service with a two-week turnaround time is available upon request.
• The mobile lab performs certification and calibration at the same level as the fixed labs.
• Certified instructors lead training and align with OSHA and NFPA 70E regulations.

Why These Companies Were Chosen

These three companies are fully accredited, ensuring their testing protocols are fair and unbiased. This is important because commissioning and maintaining electrical equipment to industry standards protects workers from harm and helps inspections run smoothly.

They also offer value-adding services, such as consulting and training. Courses are led by seasoned professionals who explain complex concepts simply. They focus on real-world situations rather than generic classroom scenarios, allowing trainees to immediately apply the practical knowledge they learn.

Lastly, each company employs electricians and safety personnel. Their engineers are licensed, certified and factory-trained, making them knowledgeable, reliable and trustworthy.

Frequently Asked Questions

Here are the answers to frequently asked questions about electrical safety testing and training.

What are the electrical safety risks at construction sites?

Overloaded circuits, frayed cords, faulty machinery or grounding issues can cause electrocution, electric shock, burns, fires or explosions.

Why should I hire a NETA-accredited company?

Construction companies should seek testing services from NETA-accredited companies because they provide unbiased third-party testing, ensuring that processes reflect modern safety standards and support defensible practices during inspections. This helps avoid OSHA penalties, which total $16,550 per serious violation.

How often should electrical safety training be offered?

OSHA states that the degree of training employers must offer is determined by the risk to the employee. Other regulations, like the NFPA 70E, must be refreshed every few years. Ongoing refresher courses are essential for keeping up with modern safety standards, especially if project or site requirements change drastically.

Safeguarding Construction Companies and Workers

Since the industry has embraced electrification, even non-electric occupations are vulnerable to electrical hazards. Contractors can safeguard their workers, assets and organizations by investing in accredited testing, training and engineering services.

*Please note that this list includes sponsored content. Some of the companies, products, or services featured have entered into commercial agreements for placement. Sponsored placements do not necessarily reflect an endorsement and should be considered alongside other options in the marketplace.